|
Robin Wilson had a hard job. The story of how the Four Colour Theorum was solved is painstakingly intricate to explain to other mathmaticians. To try and explain it to "ordinary" laymen is a phenominal task, almost as tricky as the theory itself! Unsurprisingly and understandably, Wilson slips up occasionally. Sometimes he doesn't give enough detail and explains obvious terms; often he presumes we understand more calculus than we do. For this reason, people with a very mathmatical brain and further education in mathmatics would find this book easier to cope with than other people just looking for a good read. Wilson is every bit a mathmatician, which is noticeable in every aspect of the book. He writes in rather a scattered order: nearly every page talks about something "we will see later in Chapter X" or something "as we have already seen in Chapter X" and so the flow of the book is constantly disrupted. Because of the mathmatical aspect, the vocabulary used isn't exactly mind-blowing or particularly emotive. But then, if you want wonderful writing, you buy a novel. That said, it is easy to see why this subject has excited mathmaticians past and present. One train of thought he didn't pursue (confusingly, to my mind) was that the pinicle of the book - the "solution" to the problem - may not be a solution at all. He talks of how other mathmaticians "solved" the problem in the past, and of how these solutions were disproved years later. In the case of Kempe, his solution was disproved a full eleven years after it was published. Given this information, and after learning of other mathmaticians rejection of the most recent "proof", I was surprised to read of Wilson's refusal to admit that this new solution may well be disproved in the future. This is the kind of book, which urges you to grab a pen, paper and four coloured pencils, just to see if you can out-smart the world's best mathmaticians of the previous 150 years... ... and I'm still colouring...
|