psychology at war
|
Elegantly written, in good old-fashioned English, this attempts to describe
both the relationship between First World War poet Siegfried Sassoon and the
army psychiatrist he has to engage as a result of his anti-war protest. More
broadly, this looks at the mental damage inflicted on the young men of the
British infantry and, to a lesser extent, the psychology of working women
during wartime.
|
|
Fix Their Minds So They Can Go Back Into The Slaughter of World War I
|
When the First World War broke out, most people assumed it would be over in a few months as their nation (whichever one that was) sent the others packing. In fact, many raced to enlist fearing that "the fun" might be over before they got there.
Instead, what they discovered in Western Europe was a stalemate with trenches dug from the North Sea to the Atlantic Coast across which English, French, and German soldiers faced each other for years from cold, wet, corpse-filled, and disease-ridden trenches.
No one knew how to break the stalemate. Millions died as shelling continued against these fixed positions.
Every so often some general would convince himself that a massive charge would break the other line. Each time this was tried, the slaughter accelerated as men ran into point-blank machine gun fire and artillery barrages.
Regeneration looks at the disillusionment that led one decorated English officer and poet, Siegfried Sassoon, to remonstrate against the military leadership in public. Rather than court-marital Sassoon, the military chose to send him to a psychiatrist, Dr. William Rivers. Regeneration creates a fictional account of their relationship at Craiglockhart War Hospital. The book also looks at how Rivers treated other "mental" cases sent his way.
The most interesting parts of the story come in looking at the ethical dilemma of being asked to help those who cannot mentally deal with the war any more . . . when that "help" may lead to them going back to France where their life expectancy is measured in weeks. I was reminded of stories I've read about patching up people who tried to kill themselves so they could be legally executed.
There's a revolting section on how less sensitive physicians dealt with these "mental" problems . . . basically torturing soldiers until they wouldn't resist going back to fight.
The book has two weaknesses that mar its obvious strengths in recapturing that difficult moment in English history.
1. Ms. Barker assumes that her readers already know about Siegfried Sassoon (or at least that they don't mind her holding back details about what he did for some time). I had never heard of him so it was annoying to try to figure out what all the fuss was about in the early pages. The book could use an extensive historical footnote as a prologue for those who don't know about the incident.
2. The book often skates around the edges of how Sassoon and Rivers related to one another. Much is tacit, and I found it hard to understand in all scenes what Ms. Barker was trying to suggest each one was thinking.
I commend Ms. Barker for picking real characters and bringing them to life in a way that's very poignant (even for those who aren't English) 90 years after the events have taken place.
|
|
|
A psychological look at World War I
|
Unlike many novels about World War I, Regeneration doesn't offer graphic tragedy and horror. Rather, it focuses on the psychological tragedy of soldiers who live through it and have to then live with their experiences. It is based on the story of Siegfried Sassoon who wrote a Declaration of protest against the futility of the war in 1917 and was sent to a psychiatric hospital as a result. Barker then looks at the war through the mental suffering of those officers who have been sent there.
This results in an arms length view, but it gives you time to consider the nature of break-down, shell shock, human psychological resistance, misunderstanding of the mind in the early 1900's and the sadness which comes from the suffocating expectation placed upon men of the time.
A thoughtful novel which mixes fact and fiction to produce an alternative picture of World War I.
|
|
Dull.
|
|
This book irritated me as the writer fought hard to describe to us the horrors of world war one - and failed dismally. I was relieved and unimpressed when i finally reached the last page. Unless you are studying poetry this book will hold no interest for you whatsoever. I have already bought the two follow up books to this one and am rolling my eyes upwards in anticipation......
|
|
|
Absolute must have for A-level students or world war lovers
|
|
when I first read the first few lines in this book i was thinking: do i really want to do this? but i really did not have a choice so decided to read it. it is not a book you would want to pick up and read over and over again, but that does not make it a pleasurable read. it really is i found it really informative and there is quite a lot of reference on madness and how it was viewed in the war period, something that will be quite interesting if like me you are studying english literature a-level. i think that this book is definitely a must have, and just because i started with all the bad things about the book doesn't mean that it isn't great it is. I read this book about 3 months ago and still remember in detail almost everything that happens in every chapter- and i am a very forgetful person. you will not need to read it again because it sticks the first time. hope this really helps you guys. one thing i need to add though, if you are interested you woul be better buying the whole trilogy, that way you can see how everything adds up, and it really isn't that much money to add.
|
|
|
United States | 
United Kingdom | 
Canada